What founder of the United Nations Organisation would ever have dreamt that it would one day morph into a latter-day version of 19th century Paris's Theatre du Grand Guignol?
Essential reading from antiwar.com's Justin Raimondo - one who always manages to nail it:
"It's no wonder the Israeli Foreign Ministry initially held back from releasing a transcript of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to the UN General Assembly: Bibi's wackiness doesn't bear close scrutiny. Perhaps 'wacky' isn't quite the right word for his 40-minute peroration, during which he pulled out a bomb 'diagram' and a red marker to illustrate where he would draw a 'red line' defining the outer limits of Iran's nuclear program. Cartoonish is more like it. The cartoonish quality of the bomb drawing underscored the content and tone of the speech, which was the jeremiad of a radical ideologue rather than anything one would expect from a statesman: 'Today a great battle is being waged between the modern and the medieval. Israel stands proudly with the forces of modernity. We protect the right of all our citizens, men and women, Jews and Arabs, Muslims and Christians, all are equal before the law.'
"Israel, which privileges its priestly caste, has a state religion, and bases its national mythology on a promise from G-d, is as medieval as any of its neighbors. Aside from being a lie, however, this statement is interesting because it evokes the very same supremacist spirit that animates the controversial pro-Israel public relations campaign launched by the Jewish state's extremist American supporters. Posters in the public transport system, from New York to San Francisco, proclaim: 'In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.'
"No wonder the Israeli consulates in New York and San Francisco won't disavow those vile subway posters: Pamela Geller is the new public face of Israel.
"Yes, Israel protects the rights of all citizens - unless they're Palestinians who happen to own property coveted by the 'settlers', in which case it doesn't. And the key word here is citizens: of course, the Palestinians in the occupied territories are not citizens, but helots with no rights, and no protection from fanatical Jewish fundamentalists who have launched hundreds of attacks on their homes, and sought to displace them at every opportunity, with the active complicity of the Israeli government.
"The idea that Israel represents 'modernity' is rich, considering that every day Israeli society is sinking lower into the morass of religious and cultural fundamentalism, a regression that has not gone unnoticed in the West. Bibi opened his speech with biblical references, describing Jerusalem as the 'eternal capital' of Israel and declaring that 'the Jewish state will live forever.' Yet as we secularists know, nothing lives 'forever', and the idea of a city being the 'eternal' capital of anything is a metaphor, at best, at worst a dangerous delusion. If this is the 'modern' then one wonders how much it differs from the 'medieval.' But let's not linger too long over the obvious. Bibi rants on: 'Militant Islam has many branches, from the rulers of Iran with their revolutionary guards to al-Qaeda... but they're all rooted in the same soil. It's not whether this fanaticism will be defeated, but how many lives will be lost before it's defeated. Nothing could imperil my country more than arming Iran with nuclear weapons. To imagine what the world would be like with a nuclear Iran, imagine what the world would be like with a nuclear al-Qaeda. There's no difference.'
"The Israeli Prime minister may have been addressing the UN General Assembly, but he was really talking to the Americans, whose fear and loathing of the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks can always be counted on to raise them to new levels of hysteria. Outside that context, however, equating the Iranians with Al Qaeda makes about as much sense as likening the late unlamented Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden - and, hey wait, didn't we hear that equation made endlessly in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq? Yet this was not a time for subtlety from the Israeli Prime Minister - the cartoon 'bomb' ended all hope of that - but for the crudest sort of propaganda, which is, of course, war propaganda.
"Imagine if Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, who addressed the UN that day minutes before Netanyahu took the stage, had said 'Militant Judaism has many branches, from the Washington offices of AIPAC to the center of Jewish power in Tel Aviv - but they're all rooted in the same soil' of intolerance? Picture him conjuring images of violent Jewish 'fanaticism' - not a hard task, given what is happening in Israel today. If he had done so, Abbas would have been denounced in every Western capital as the 21st century incarnation of Hitler.
"Netanyahu went on to cite the nonexistent 'record of Iranian aggression without nuclear weapons' - an odd claim, since Iran hasn't attacked a single one of its neighbors since the Battle of Thermopylae. The country did fight one war in modern times, when it was attacked by Iraq, which was being backed by the United States. However, it's necessary to remember that war propaganda has no need of facts: only emotionally-charged evocations of rage - and fear: 'Given this record of Iranian aggression without nuclear weapons, just imagine an Iran with nuclear weapons. Who among you would feel safe in the Middle East? Who'd be safe in Europe? Who'd be safe in America? Who'd be safe anywhere?'
"That this alleged champion of 'modernity' should base his case on fearmongering should come as no surprise: hasn't fear been the leitmotif of all the 'modern' ideologies of aggressive nationalism? Fear of the Other, of the barbarian at the gates - the 'savage' who, at the first opportunity, will tear your throat out with his bare teeth - is what keeps ideologues like Netanyahu and his American co-thinkers in business.
"Those Eye-ranians, says Bibi, aren't like the rest of us, which is why deterrence won't work. 'Iran's apocalyptic leaders' are awaiting the return of the Mahdi, a holy man, whose reappearance is supposed to occur after a devastating war: 'Militant jihadists are not secular Marxists. Militant jihadists behave very differently. There were no Soviet suicide bombers.'
"Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the Israelis also awaiting the return of Someone Special, a Messiah who will lead them out of the wilderness and establish the Kingdom of Jerusalem as His earthly domain? Militant jihadists may not be secular Marxists - but then again, militant Zionists aren't either. I would no more trust nuclear bombs in Bibi's hands than I would in Ahmedinajad's - the difference being that the former is actually in possession of such weapons.
"Which brings us to the absurdity of this lecture by the leader of the only nuclear-armed country in the region: here is a nation which refuses even to admit it acquired nukes long ago, and which disdains the Nonproliferation Treaty, making the case for a war against the neighbor that has indeed signed the NPT and is abiding by its requirements.
"That treaty gives Tehran the right to develop nuclear power. Furthermore, there is zero evidence Iran is embarked on a nuclear weapons program: our own intelligence community tells us they gave that up in 2003 and show no signs of resuming it. Their own religious and political leaders have denounced the possession of of nuclear power as sinful: the Israelis, on the other hand, haven't bothered reassuring us they would never use the nukes they won't admit they have.
"In a rational world, Israel would be in the dock, answering for its unwillingness to come out of the nuclear closet and admit what the whole world knows by now. Indeed, Bibi could give us some insight into how Israel
"In the world in which we are living, however, in which the innocent are put on trial and the guilty sit in judgement, the situation is quite different. In that world, the leader of a tiny nation entirely dependent on US largesse takes to the UN podium to issue his marching orders to Washington. Here is my 'red line', says Bibi - daring not only the Iranians but also the Americans to cross it."
"Think of Netanyahu's UN oration as just another Romney campaign speech, in which the GOP presidential candidate says Tehran must not be allowed to get 'one turn of the screwdriver away' from joining the nuclear club. According to Netanyahu, Iran is nearly at that point today, and will have a nuclear weapon in less than a year if the US fails to act.
"This is technical nonsense, but then again the truth has nothing to do with war propaganda: to the average American, the mere possession of weapons-grade uranium means all the Iranians have to do is plug it in and hurl it, slingshot style, in the general direction of Israel. This is an impression Israeli propagandists would dearly love to inculcate in the American public, and they have the great advantage of relying on general ignorance of the technical details. Good luck explaining to Mr. Average American why it would take a good four years after they've weaponized their nuclear material for the Iranians to create a useable nuke.
"The ticking-bomb theme, which has been used to justify everything from torture to the invasion of Iraq, permeates Israeli propaganda in the US and was a central theme of Bibi's speech. His message was clear: 'the hour is getting late.' We must act without giving too much thought to the possible consequences. Don't delay, don't think, act now - before the fraud is exposed, and we discover that - as in the case of the Iraqis - those 'weapons of mass destruction' were just a figment of our easily manipulated collective imagination."
For other reviews of Netanyahu's performances, see my posts Benzion, My Father (24/9/11), The Parallel World of Benjamin Netanyahu (26/9/11), Doing the Time Warp Again (7/3/12), and Another Compelling Reason to Go to War (8/3/12).